Oral Health Clearance Outcomes for Cardiovascular Surgery.

Objective: To determine the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving dental extractions before planned cardiovascular surgery (CVS) and examine factors that may affect the chance of oral health clearance. Patients and Methods: A retrospective medical record review was performed of patients who underwent dental screening before CVS from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021, at a major medical institution. A total of 496 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 patients were cleared to advance to planned CVS (n=390). Group 2 patients were not cleared for surgery and subsequently underwent dental extractions before planned CVS (n=106). Results: Six patients (5.7%) experienced postoperative complications after dental extraction that resulted in an emergency room visit. No deaths occurred after dental extraction before CVS. However, 4 patients died within 30 days of CVS, 3 from Group 1 (0.77%) and 1 from Group 2 (0.94%). Dental extraction before planned CVS showed a borderline significant association with death based on unadjusted (P=.06) and age-adjusted analysis (P=.05). Patients who reported seeing a dentist routinely had a significantly higher chance of oral health clearance (P <.001). No differences were noted between the 2 groups with regard to age, sex, or 30-day hospital readmission rate. Conclusion: Patients who had dental extractions completed before planned CVS may be at an increased risk of mortality. Further studies are needed to examine this relationship. Emphasis should be on prioritization of routine dental visits before planned CVS.

Probing Depth and Peri-implant Health as Related to Buccal and Lingual Bone Thickness Around Dental Implants: An Experimental Study.

A retrospective chart review was conducted of CBCT images captured between November 2019 and April 2021 on patients who underwent dental implant placement and had a periodontal charting. The buccal and lingual bone thickness around the implants was measured as an average of three measurements taken from the buccal and lingual aspects of implants. Implants with peri-implantitis were placed in Group 1, and implants with peri-implant mucositis or good peri-implant health were placed in Group 2. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the differences between the bone thicknesses of the groups. In total, 93 CBCT radiographs were screened, and 15 CBCT images with both an implant and corresponding periodontal charting were analyzed. Of the 15 implants examined, 5 presented with peri-implantitis (33%), 1 with peri-implant mucositis, and 9 with good peri-implant health. Within the limitations of this study, buccal bone thickness averaging ≥ 1.10 mm or midlingual probing depths ≤ 3.4 mm correlates with a more favorable peri-implant response. Larger studies are needed to substantiate these findings.

Surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation of siblings with Witkop tooth and nail syndrome using zygomatic implants: a familial case series of 3 patients with up to 15-year follow-up.

Witkop tooth and nail syndrome is a rare, autosomal dominant type of ectodermal dysplasia that can have significant effects on dentition, including hypoplastic and malformed dentition and significantly atrophic maxillas. Endosseous implants have become one possible solution to replace missing teeth, although their use in areas where bone is sparse becomes challenging. Due to the severe atrophy of the maxillary alveolus, extensive preprosthetic surgeries including orthognathic surgery, extensive bone grafting, and sinus floor augmentations have been recommended prior to placement of endosseous dental implants. Although this treatment has shown favorable outcomes, it requires multiple surgical procedures, contributing to a prolonged treatment course and increased morbidity. An alternative treatment of atrophic maxillas in patients with ectodermal dysplasia includes the use of zygomatic implants. This familial case series discusses 3 siblings, all previously diagnosed with Witkop Syndrome, who underwent comprehensive preprosthetic surgery and prosthetic rehabilitation using zygomatic implants with a follow-up period up to 15 years.

What is the Incidence of Oral Cancer Recurrence in Patients Reconstructed With a Microvascular Free Flap, Endosseous Implants, and an Oral Prosthesis and How Does the Timing of Implant Placement Influence Recurrence?

PURPOSE: In patients with malignant oral disease, there is concern that immediate implant placement at the time of ablative and microvascular free flap surgery can contribute to tumor recurrence or delay the diagnosis of recurrence. The purpose of this study is to 1) estimate the incidence of recurrence in patients with malignant disease treated with immediate microvascular free flap reconstruction, endosseous implants, and an oral prosthesis, 2) measure and compare the timing of implant placement, immediate versus delayed, and the time to complete oral rehabilitation, and 3) measure the association between the timing of implant placement and tumor recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing medical record analysis involving patients with malignant oral cancer undergoing tumor resection and immediate microvascular reconstruction from 1996 to 2019 at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN by the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Additional inclusion criteria comprised of immediate or delayed endosseous implant placement, the fabrication of an oral prosthesis, and a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, timing of implant placement and prosthesis loading, type of prosthesis, tumor recurrence, or second primary tumor events were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with a mean follow-up of 6.4 years were included. Twenty-four patients (72.7%) were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma with 3 patients experiencing tumor recurrence. Fifteen patients had immediate implant placement while 18 patients had delayed implant placement. The mean number of days to prosthetic loading of the implants was 680.4 days and 330.1 days for the delayed implant group and immediate implant group, respectively, which was statistically significant (P = .004). The timing of implant placement and the event of a recurrence were not statistically significant (P = .075). CONCLUSION: The incidence of recurrence in patients with malignant oral cancer treated with microvascular reconstruction, endosseous implants, and an oral prosthesis was 12.5% with one recurrence occurring beneath the oral prosthesis. Delayed implant placement resulted in a statistically significant delay in the completion of oral rehabilitation compared to immediate implant placement. There was no difference in the incidence of recurrence in the immediate implant group compared to the delayed implant group.

The influence of antimicrobial varnish on peri-implant soft tissue health: case report.

Bacterial biofilm in the oral cavity and around dental implants may trigger an inflammatory response of the peri-implant soft tissue. Emerging antimicrobial products have been developed to combat peri-implant soft tissue pathology; however, limited evidence is available evaluating their effectiveness. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first documented case report in the literature assessing the effect of Cervitec Plus around dental implants. This case report provides an example of a patient presenting to a periodontal specialty clinic with peri-implant pathology and subsequently treated with antimicrobial varnish following dental hygiene peri-implant therapy. The report serves to evaluate the efficacy of peri-implant soft tissue pathology utilizing antimicrobial varnish as measured by percent of bleeding upon probing, presence of suppuration, and changes in implant probing depths. Understanding the impact of bacterial plaque on peri-implant soft tissue and the effectiveness of antimicrobial products in conjunction with dental hygiene peri-implant therapy may provide patients with optimal peri-implant health and long-term success of dental implants.

The Effect of Patient Specific Factors on Occlusal Forces Generated: Best Evidence Consensus Statement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this Best Evidence Consensus Statement was to search the literature to determine if there is a relationship between patient specific factors and occlusal force. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was conducted in the following databases: Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (EBMR), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print. Articles on patient factors and occlusal force were compiled by using a combination of the key words: "bite force," "occlusal force," "partial and complete edentulism," "bruxism," and "orthognathic class." Inclusion criteria included meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, case series, and journal articles. Exclusion criteria were case reports, studies in children, animals, and bench studies. RESULTS: Of the 1502 articles that met the initial search criteria, 97 related to patient-specific factors affecting occlusal forces. These articles were evaluated, rated, and organized into appropriate categories addressing questions of foci. CONCLUSIONS: The range of occlusal force is highly variable among subjects correlated to patient specific factors such as age, gender, partial and complete edentulism, the presence of a maxillofacial defect, location of edentulous area, orthognathic profile, and magnitude of occlusal vertical dimension. Tooth replacement therapies targeted at increasing occlusal contact seem to have a positive effect on increasing occlusal force. Bruxism does not necessarily demonstrate higher occlusal powering but may have greater tooth contact time. Occlusal force is not clearly affected by the type of dental restoration or restorative material used. The clinical significance of the changes in occlusal forces is yet to be determined.

Microvascular Reconstruction of Total Maxillary Avascular Necrosis as a Complication of Routine Orthognathic Surgery.

Severe complications and morbidity after orthognathic surgery are infrequently encountered and even more infrequently reported considering the extent to which this procedure is performed by surgeons within the specialty of maxillofacial surgery. Avascular necrosis of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy is perhaps the most dreaded outcome of orthognathic surgery. However, it accounts for an extremely small subset of overall surgical complications. The reported risk factors associated with avascular maxillary necrosis include segmental osteotomies, vertical posterior impactions, large transverse expansions, anterior advancements exceeding 9 to 10 mm, an improper surgical technique, excessive soft tissue degloving of the maxilla, intraoperative hemorrhage, perforation or laceration of the palatal soft tissue pedicle, previous maxillary or palatal surgery, and other medical comorbidities. Although anecdotal cases of total maxillary necrosis after orthognathic surgery have been alluded to within the specialty as a whole, to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have reported total maxillary necrosis occurring after routine orthognathic surgery. We have presented a truly unique case of total maxillary avascular necrosis that occurred after standard 1-piece Le Fort I osteotomy in a patient without medical or surgical risk factors for the complication either known preoperatively or identified postoperatively. The resultant maxillary defect from total avascular necrosis was comprehensively treated with surgical debridement of the nonviable maxilla, osteocutaneous fibular free flap reconstruction, staged endosseous implant reconstruction of the neomaxilla, and comprehensive prosthodontic rehabilitation.

Interdisciplinary rehabilitation of a primary intraosseous carcinoma including orthodontic archform management.

Squamous cell carcinomas arising from keratocystic odontogentic tumors are a rare phenomenon in head and neck cancer, accounting for only 1.45% of oral squamous cell carcinomas, and are classified as primary intraosseous carninomas. This cancer is locally aggressive, has a high potential for recurrence, and requires radical resection and subsequent rehabilitation. This case report describes a patient diagnosed with this uncommon tumor who was treated by dental specialists at Mayo Clinic. During convalescence, orthodontic changes to the maxillary dental archform were observed secondary to alterations in the soft tissue equilibrium following mandibulectomy and reconstruction with a microvascular fibula free flap. This highlights the need for treatment plan adaptability, the role of orthodontists in maintenance or treatment of pre-resection archforms, and the interdisciplinary nature necessary in managing the complex oncologic, functional, and esthetic needs in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer.

Facial Versus Skeletal Landmarks for Anterior-Posterior Diagnosis in Orthognathic Surgery and Orthodontics: Are They the Same?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate diagnostic agreement in anterior-posterior (AP) categorization of the maxilla and mandible between a skeletal-landmark analysis and a facial-landmark analysis for treatment planning of orthognathic surgery and orthodontics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, consecutive case series of adult patients who presented to the Mayo Clinic orthodontic department compared maxillary and mandibular AP diagnoses. Steiner's analysis of the sella-nasion-A point angle and sella-nasion-B point angle was used for a skeletal-landmark diagnosis. Element II of Andrews' 6 elements of orofacial harmony was used for a facial-landmark diagnosis. Both diagnoses were categorized as either deficient, optimal, or excessive for each jaw. Categorization of the skeletal landmark was determined by normative data, whereas the facial landmark provides a customized categorization unique to each individual. RESULTS: Weighted κ statistics were completed to test agreement between the categories determined by the skeletal and facial landmarks. The maxilla showed poor agreement, and the mandible showed slight agreement. CONCLUSIONS: No agreement was found for AP categorization of the maxilla and mandible between skeletal-landmark and facial-landmark analyses. Most mandibles were diagnosed as retrognathic by the facial landmark, whereas most were diagnosed as optimal by the skeletal landmark. When the 2 landmarks disagreed, the facial landmark defined the optimal position farther anterior. The landmark chosen for diagnosis will impact the optimal jaw position and can affect orthognathic and orthodontic outcomes.

Association Between Early Implant Failure and Prosthodontic Characteristics.

PURPOSE: To identify associations between early implant failure and prosthodontic characteristics that could be used to guide subsequent continuous quality improvement efforts of patient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An implant-level analysis was performed in which data were abstracted from a prospective clinical database of all adult patients treated with implants and followed up from January 2000 through December 2014 at the Department of Dental Specialties at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. These data were used to determine time to implant failure. Associations between prosthodontic characteristics and early implant failure were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards regression models and summarized with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 8762 implants in 2787 patients, 395 (4.5%) failed within the first year of placement at a mean (SD) of 127 (97) days (range, 2-364 days). Univariable analysis showed no associations between early implant failure and use of a cover screw, prosthesis, or definitive or provisional prosthesis at implant placement. Three of 25 single crowns failed, and use of a single crown was significantly associated with early implant failure (HR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.08-14.35; P = 0.04). This study identified no significant associations between prosthodontic characteristics identified after implant placement and early implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a prosthesis at implant placement, use of a definitive or provisional prosthesis, and early mechanical complications were not associated with increased risk of early implant failure. Quality improvement efforts should focus on aspects of decision making that aim to decrease surgical complications.

Early Implant Failure Associated With Patient Factors, Surgical Manipulations, and Systemic Conditions.

PURPOSE: Systematic monitoring of important clinical outcomes is increasingly important for health-care decision making, especially in the context of continuous quality improvement. Dental implant failure within the first year (early failure) has been previously shown to be more common than subsequent failure. The purpose of this study was to identify associations between early implant failure and patient factors, surgical manipulations, and systemic conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively identified the records of consecutive adult patients with dental implants seen between 2000 and 2014 in the Department of Dental Specialties, at the Mayo Clinic. Demographic, surgical, and medical data were extracted from the database and individual medical records to determine time to first implant failure. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations of demographic, surgical, and systemic conditions with implant failure during the first year post-implantation, summarized as hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS: Among 8540 implants identified during the study period, 362 (4.2%) failed within the first year of placement at a mean (SD) of 129 (96) days after placement. On univariate analysis, most candidate predictors were not shown to influence first-year failure. Preplacement surgical manipulations associated with increased early implant failure were bone augmentation only (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.02-2.05; p = 0.04), socket preservation (HR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.33-5.38; p = 0.006), and xenogenic material (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.11-4.04; p = 0.02). Alveoloplasty only at placement was associated with decreased early implant failure (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.65; p = 0.001). Overall, 318 implants (3.7%) had surgical complications within the first year of placement at a mean (SD) of 110 (114) days after placement; any surgical complication was significantly associated with early implant failure (hazard ratio, 15.84; 95% CI, 11.10-22.61; p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, and implant era, no single or multiple medical condition(s) and no single or multiple medication(s) increased patient risk of implant failure in the first year after placement. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a targeted effort to reduce the incidence of surgical complications to reduce early failure of dental implants.

Prosthetic rehabilitation of a maxillary defect with a bone anchored prosthesis: A clinical report.

Mucormycosis is an opportunistic fungal infection that frequently infects sinuses, brain, or lungs and arises mostly in immunocompromised patients. Although its occurrence in the maxilla is rare, debridement and resection of the infected and necrotic area is often the best treatment but usually results in an extensive maxillary defect. Protocols for prosthetic obturation versus microvascular reconstruction have been established and used effectively in tertiary institutions for patients with such large defects. Aramany Class VI defects involving more than half of the palatal surface can be managed effectively by surgical reconstruction using microvascular free flaps as a platform for supporting bone-anchored prostheses. Providing fixed prostheses may offer advantages over a conventional obturator prosthesis in terms of hygiene, function, and esthetics. Nonetheless, fixed prostheses retained by endosseous implants in patients with reconstructive osteomyocutaneous flaps often require a sequential team approach by the surgeon and prosthodontist. This clinical report describes the reconstruction of a maxilla by using a scapular free flap with subsequent prosthetic rehabilitation in a patient with maxillary sinus infection secondary to mucormycosis.

Effect of different resin luting cements on the marginal fit of lithium disilicate pressed crowns.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The vertical marginal discrepancy of restorations can increase upon cementation, and poor marginal fit can lead to cement dissolution, marginal discoloration, microleakage, and secondary caries. The amount of increase is related to the type of luting cement used, but how lithium disilicate pressed crowns are affected by different resin cements is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of using different resin luting cements on the vertical marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate pressed crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 18 intact extracted mandibular third molars were disinfected in a solution of 10% formalin for 7 days and were then prepared to receive a ceramic crown. Impressions were made with polyvinyl siloxane and lithium disilicate pressed crowns made and cemented with 1 of 3 resin luting cements. The marginal discrepancy was measured at 4 points on the finishing line of each tooth, with optical microscopy at ×200 magnification before and after cementation. Statistical analysis was done with the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the median marginal increase among the 3 groups (a=.05). RESULTS: The least amount of marginal increase after cementation was with Harvard PremiumFlow cement, with an average marginal increase of 42 ±11 µm. RelyX Ultimate cement increased the margins by an average 45 ±29 µm. The highest marginal increase was found in the Enamel Plus HRi preheated composite resin group (116 ±47 µm). CONCLUSIONS: The marginal increase of pressed crowns cemented with preheated composite resin (Enamel Plus HRi) exceeded the clinically acceptable range of marginal discrepancy.

Consistency of Dental Hygiene Therapy Utilizing Various Dental Hygiene Instrumentation and Its Effect on Peri-implant Health and Survival of Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to provide practice-based evidence to determine if the consistency of dental hygiene therapy, despite utilizing instrumentation literature that has proven to cause alterations to implant surfaces, affects peri-implant health or survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample comprised patients with implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prostheses who were distributed into two groups. The consistent hygiene group patients had dental hygiene therapy at a minimum biannually and were exposed to at least three dental hygiene instrument materials. The inconsistent hygiene group patients had dental hygiene therapy at a minimum once every 3 to 10 years and were exposed to at least three dental hygiene instrument materials. Years of survival free of soft tissue pathology and/or implant failure were estimated. Continuous features were summarized with medians, interquartile ranges (IQRs), and ranges; categorical features were summarized with frequency counts and percentages. RESULTS: Among 48 patients in the consistent hygiene group, 11 patients experienced soft tissue pathology or implant failure at a median of 11.3 years; among 99 patients in the inconsistent hygiene group, 17 patients experienced soft tissue pathology or implant failure at a median of 4.8 years. The survival free of soft tissue pathology or implant failure rate at 5 years was 94% for the consistent hygiene group and 91% for the inconsistent hygiene group. The survival free of soft tissue pathology or implant failure rate at 20 years was 70% for the consistent hygiene group and 79% for the inconsistent hygiene group (P = .91). CONCLUSION: Although no statistical differences were found between the groups, this practice-based evidence suggests more consistent dental hygiene therapy increases the median in years in which soft tissue pathology or implant failure is present.

Whole-Arch Single-Stage Free Flap Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of the Mandible: A Case Report and Technical Considerations on a New Technique.

The purpose of this report is to describe the techniques used in the reconstruction of a complete angle-to-angle mandibular defect in the absence of any remaining mandibular teeth. Because no remaining dental or occlusal landmarks remain in such a case, additional challenges must be considered.

Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians.

BACKGROUND: There are many implant cases in which dental technicians take initiative with regard to the design of implant prostheses, and to a certain extent, this area of care is one in which dentists do not necessarily play the leading role. Moreover, inadequate communication between dental technicians and dentists and insufficient instructions for technicians has been highlighted as issues in the past. The purpose of this questionnaire is to improve the quality of implant prostheses and thereby contribute to patient service by clarifying, among other aspects of treatment, problem areas and considerations in the fabrication of implant prostheses, conceptual-level knowledge, and awareness of prosthodontics on the part of the dentists in charge of treatment and methods for preventing prosthetic complications. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was given to 120 certified dental technicians. To facilitate coverage of a broad range of topics, we classified the survey content into the following four categories and included detailed questions for (1) the conditions under which implant technicians work, (2) implant fixed prostheses, (3) implant overdentures, and (4) prosthetic complications. RESULTS: Out of 120 surveys sent, 74 technicians responded resulting in a response rate of 61.6%. CONCLUSIONS: This survey served to clarify the current state of implant prosthodontics, issues, and considerations in the fabrication of implant prostheses, and the state of prosthetic complications and preventive initiatives, all from a laboratory perspective. The results of this survey suggested that, to fabricate prostheses with a high level of predictability, functional utility, and aesthetic satisfaction, it is necessary to reaffirm the importance for dentists to increase their prosthetic knowledge and work together with dental technicians to develop comprehensive treatment plans, implement an organized approach to prosthesis design, and accomplish occlusal reconstruction.

Evaluation of fracture resistance in aqueous environment under dynamic loading of lithium disilicate restorative systems for posterior applications. Part 2.

PURPOSE: The goals of part 2 of the study presented here were 1) to assess whether there is a difference in failure mode of different thicknesses (2.0, 1.5, 1.0, and 0.5 mm) of anatomically standardized full contour monolithic lithium disilicate restorations for posterior teeth, and 2) to assess if there is a difference among various crown thicknesses when these restorations are subjected to dynamic load forces common for posterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups (n = 10), each with a different thickness of anatomically appropriate all-ceramic crowns, were to be tested as established from the statistical analysis of the preliminary phase. Group 1: 2.0 mm; group 2: 1.5 mm; group 3: 1.0 mm; group 4: 0.5 mm. The specimens were adhesively luted to the corresponding die, and underwent dynamic cyclic loading (380 to 390 N) completely submerged in an aqueous environment until a failure was noted by graphic recording and continuous monitoring. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference of the fatigue cycles to failure among four groups (p < 0.001; Kruskal-Wallis test). The mean number of cycles to fail for 2.0 mm specimens was 17 times more than the mean number of cycles to fail for 1.0 mm specimens and 1.5 times more than the mean number of cycles to fail for 1.5 mm specimens. The 0.5 mm specimens failed with one cycle of loading. A qualitative characteristic noted among the 2.0 mm specimens was wear of the area of indenter contact followed by shearing of the material and/or crack propagation. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, it may be reasonable to consider a crown thickness of 1.5 mm or greater for clinical applications of milled monolithic lithium disilicate crowns for posterior single teeth.

Practice-based clinical evaluation of ceramic single crowns after at least five years.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Long-term practice-based clinical evaluations of various contemporary ceramic crown restorations from multiple practitioners are limited. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical performance of ceramic single crowns and to identify factors that influence their clinical performance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ceramic single crowns that had been placed at the Mayo Clinic and in function since 2005 were identified and included in the study. The restorations were examined clinically, radiographically, and with photographs. Modified United States Public Health Services criteria were used for the clinical evaluation. The ceramic systems evaluated were bilayer and monolayer. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (41 women, 18 men) with 226 single teeth and implants restored with single ceramic crowns were identified. The mean duration from insertion date to study examination date was 6.1 years. Thirteen restorations (6%) were replaced at a mean 3.3 years after insertion date (range, 0.1-6.1 years). Estimated replacement-free survival rates (95% confidence interval [CI]; number of teeth/implants still at risk) at 5 years after insertion date were 95.1% (95% CI, 92.2-98.1; 153) and at 10 years were 92.8% (95% CI, 89.1-96.8; 8). The most common reason for replacement was fracture to the core of posterior layered ceramic crowns. The most commonly used luting agent was resin-modified ionomer cement. Most restorations exhibited clinically acceptable marginal integrity, shade, no caries recurrence, and no periapical pathology. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical performance of ceramic single crowns at 5 and 10 years supports their application in all areas of the mouth. With the majority of fractures to the core occurring early in the lifetime of layered ceramic posterior crowns, consideration of other monolithic ceramic systems for posterior crowns is advised.